Could China be drawn into the Iran war after strike on state-owned oil tanker? | DW News

Key Concepts

• Strait of Hormuz: A critical maritime chokepoint for global oil transit.
• Strategic Oil Reserves: National stockpiles maintained by China to mitigate energy supply shocks.
• Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): China’s global infrastructure development strategy, which has seen stagnated investment in Iran due to sanctions.
• Asymmetric Warfare: A conflict between belligerents whose relative military power differs significantly, often leading to tactical wins but strategic losses.
• Global South: A geopolitical grouping of developing nations that China is actively courting to challenge Western influence.

---

1. The Attack on the Chinese Vessel

A Chinese-owned oil tanker was attacked in the Strait of Hormuz on a Monday, marking the first such incident involving a Chinese vessel in the current conflict. The Chinese Foreign Ministry confirmed the event on Friday, four days later.

• Details: The vessel is flagged in the Marshall Islands and carries a Chinese crew. No casualties were reported.
• Strategic Delay: Andrea Gazelli suggests the four-day delay in confirmation was a deliberate diplomatic signal. By withholding immediate confirmation, Beijing avoided being forced into a position where it would have to take a public stance or retaliate, thereby maintaining its neutrality.

2. China’s Stance on the Iran-US Conflict

China is attempting to balance its role as a key ally of Iran with its desire to avoid direct military involvement.

• Economic Interests: While China is a major buyer of Iranian oil, it is less dependent on Middle Eastern oil than Japan or South Korea. China has also been electrifying its economy and building strategic reserves, which provides a buffer against supply shocks.
• Diplomatic Strategy: Beijing prefers to act behind the scenes. It has supported Pakistan as a mediator for talks in Islamabad, signaling a preference for regional partners to handle negotiations rather than taking a direct, high-profile role.
• The "No-Loss" Policy: Gazelli notes that while China wants the crisis to end to restore global trade, it does not want Iran to "lose." There is a significant overlap in goals between Tehran and Beijing, meaning China will not force Iran to compromise on its core interests.

3. Impact of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)

Despite the much-publicized 25-year cooperation agreement between China and Iran, investment has largely stagnated.

• Obstacles: International sanctions remain a critical barrier for Chinese companies.
• Comparative Advantage: Iran offers limited economic incentives compared to neighboring countries, which have successfully attracted larger shares of Chinese capital over the past decade.

4. Geopolitical Ambitions and Global Perception

China is leveraging the current crisis to reshape its international image, particularly in the Global South.

• Narrative Framing: Beijing consistently frames the crisis as "US-made," blaming American policy for global fuel shortages and instability.
• Soft Power: China aims to portray itself as a "predictable and stable" power, contrasting this with what it characterizes as an "unpredictable and volatile" United States.
• Legitimacy: Recent polls suggest a decline in the perceived legitimacy of American power, a trend China is actively exploiting to strengthen its influence among developing nations.

5. Implications for Taiwan

The conflict in the Middle East is influencing Chinese calculations regarding Taiwan in complex ways:

• Asymmetric Lessons: The war demonstrates how asymmetric warfare can allow a weaker party to win tactical battles while the stronger party (the US) suffers strategic exhaustion.
• Strategic Opportunity: The crisis may provide China with leverage during upcoming diplomatic engagements with the Trump administration. Gazelli suggests China might offer to exert influence over Iran in exchange for softer US rhetoric or policy shifts regarding Taiwan.
• Caution: Beijing remains wary of the volatility of US leadership, noting that promises made by the US administration may not be kept once officials return to Washington.

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

China’s primary objective is to minimize the negative impact of the Iran-US conflict on the global economy, which threatens its status as the world’s largest exporter. While China is currently insulated from immediate energy crises due to its strategic reserves and diversified energy strategy, a prolonged conflict poses a long-term threat to its industrial base. Beijing is currently navigating a delicate path: it is avoiding direct military involvement while using the crisis to undermine the perceived legitimacy of the United States and potentially extract concessions regarding its own core interests, such as Taiwan.