'Close doesn't count': Mideast experts assess potential U.S.-Iran agreement

Key Concepts

• JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action): The 2015 nuclear deal framework often referenced as a benchmark for current negotiations.
• HEU (Highly Enriched Uranium): A critical component of nuclear weapons development; a central point of contention in negotiations.
• Frozen Assets: Funds belonging to Iran held in foreign banks, restricted due to international sanctions.
• Proxy Forces: Groups like Hezbollah, supported by Iran to project influence and destabilize regional adversaries.
• Sanctions Relief: The easing of economic penalties in exchange for nuclear concessions.
• Deterrence: The strategic use of military or economic pressure to prevent aggression.

---

1. The State of Negotiations

The discussion highlights a recurring pattern in US-Iran relations: both sides claim to be "close" to a deal, yet they present conflicting narratives regarding the content of those agreements.

• The "85% Problem": Allan Eyre notes that while both sides appear to recognize that military escalation is counterproductive, the final stages of negotiation are the most difficult. "Close doesn't count" is the consensus, as the closer parties get to a deal, the more sensitive the remaining points of contention become.
• Conflicting Narratives: A major hurdle is the discrepancy between what Washington tracks and what Tehran communicates to its domestic audience. Iran is highly sensitive to how a deal is framed, specifically regarding its nuclear program and the release of frozen assets.

2. Nuclear Program and Economic Motivations

• The "Sacred" Program: Mead Maliki emphasizes that Iran has invested over $900 billion into its nuclear program. The regime markets this program to its citizens as a source of energy and a deterrent against foreign aggression, despite it producing less than 10% of Iran's electricity.
• Regime Survival: Because the regime has tied its legitimacy to this program, it is unlikely to agree to a total dismantling of its enrichment capabilities.
• Asset Management: Regarding frozen assets, the US position is that funds are "restricted" rather than "blocked." The US strategy involves allowing access only for humanitarian trade (non-sanctionable goods), ensuring that funds are not directly released to the regime’s general treasury.

3. Regional Spoilers and Geopolitical Dynamics

• The Lebanon/Hezbollah Factor: A significant "spoiler" in current negotiations is Iran’s insistence that any ceasefire must be wide-ranging and include Lebanon.
• Israeli Domestic Politics: Allan Eyre argues that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces a toxic political environment. If the US forces Israel to stand down regarding Hezbollah, it could severely damage Netanyahu’s domestic standing ahead of potential elections, making Israel a likely obstacle to a US-brokered de-escalation.
• Proxy Warfare: Maliki argues that as the Iranian regime fails domestically, it increasingly relies on exporting its revolution through proxy forces to satisfy its core ideological base. Even if Iran commits to stopping support for these groups, the covert nature of these operations allows them to continue their destabilizing activities behind closed doors.

4. Strategic Assessment: Is the US Better Off?

The experts offer a nuanced view on whether the current situation represents an improvement for US interests:

• Economic and Military Decline: Maliki contends that the Iranian regime is in a much weaker position today than it was years ago. He notes that while Iran previously projected power as far as Venezuela, it is now struggling to maintain internal stability.
• Deterrence: The consensus is that the security threat posed by Iran is currently being "deterred or delayed." The combination of economic hardship and internal domestic pressure has forced the regime to focus on survival, which, according to Maliki, puts the US in a stronger position than in previous years.

5. Notable Quotes

• Allan Eyre: "85% is actually sort of terrifying because the closer you get, the harder it is."
• Mead Maliki: "The more the Islamic Republic fails domestically... the more it really turns outward, exporting its revolution, expanding its destabilizing influence to really satisfy that ideological commitment."

Synthesis

The dialogue suggests that while a diplomatic breakthrough is theoretically possible, it is hampered by deep-seated mistrust and the need for both regimes to satisfy domestic political audiences. Iran seeks to maintain its nuclear "prestige" and gain economic relief without appearing to capitulate, while the US seeks to contain Iran’s regional influence and nuclear ambitions. The primary takeaway is that the current "closeness" to a deal is fragile, threatened by regional actors like Israel and the inherent difficulty of verifying covert support for proxy groups. Ultimately, the US appears to be benefiting from the regime's internal economic and social instability, which serves as a natural, albeit volatile, check on Iranian aggression.