Can USMCA Survive Trump’s Second Term?

Key Concepts

• USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement): The trilateral trade agreement replacing NAFTA, currently undergoing a mandatory 6-year review process.
• Sunset Provision: A clause requiring a review of the agreement every six years to determine if it remains "fit for purpose" and to allow for modifications.
• Rules of Origin: Regulations determining the percentage of a product's components that must originate within the USMCA region to qualify for duty-free status.
• Integrated Supply Chain: The economic reality where North American industries (particularly automotive) rely on cross-border components and shared production processes.
• Fortress North America: A strategic approach to trade policy aimed at insulating the regional market from external competitors, specifically China.
• Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): The cross-border capital flow between the three nations, which relies heavily on the regulatory certainty provided by the USMCA.

---

1. The 6-Year Review and Stability

The panel discussed the current "scary" prospect of the USMCA review. Kirsten Hillman clarified that even if parties fail to agree on modifications by July 1st, the existing agreement remains in place. The 6-year review mechanism is viewed as a positive evolution from NAFTA, which was rigid and difficult to update. If the parties agree on modifications, the deal is extended for another 16 years, with the next review scheduled in 6 years.

2. The Automotive Sector and the "China Factor"

A central theme is the shift in the automotive landscape compared to six years ago, specifically the threat of Chinese automotive exports.

• Strategic Objectives: Kelly Ann Shaw noted that the Trump administration views trade as a "zero-sum game." The administration is expected to push for aggressive changes to Rules of Origin, including higher domestic content requirements to ensure vehicles are manufactured in the US and to exclude Chinese components.
• Economic Reality: Gerónimo Gutiérrez Fernández highlighted that 40% of the value of every dollar exported from Mexico to the US consists of US-made components. He argued that any policy changes must account for this integration to ensure that North American companies (like Ford and GM) remain globally competitive.

3. Geopolitical Context and Regional Security

The panelists emphasized that trade negotiations are currently complicated by a "contaminated agenda" involving complex geopolitical and security issues.

• Trilateral Importance: Despite political friction, the consensus is that a trilateral agreement is essential for regional stability.
• Investment Data: Gutiérrez Fernández provided key figures on investment: the US has a stock of approximately $160 billion in FDI in Mexico, while Mexico has roughly $60 billion in the US. When normalized by the size of the respective economies, Mexico is a significant investor in the US, underscoring the mutual reliance on the agreement for business certainty.

4. Key Arguments and Perspectives

• Kirsten Hillman (Former Canadian Ambassador): Argued that the USMCA is the foundation of the integrated North American relationship, covering critical areas like intellectual property, agriculture, and services. She emphasized that the agreement is "fit for purpose" and that Canada will work toward stability.
• Gerónimo Gutiérrez Fernández (Former Mexican Ambassador): Argued that the USMCA has not yet reached its full potential because its implementation in 2020 coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic. He believes the agreement is a fundamental tool for regional production and that the next 12 months will be critical for reaching a consensus.
• Kelly Ann Shaw (Former USTR General Counsel): Provided insight into the Trump administration’s skepticism, noting that while the President views the USMCA as an improvement over NAFTA, he remains focused on using the review process to bolster domestic industry and protect against external competition.

5. Notable Quotes

• Gerónimo Gutiérrez Fernández: "We have never been, I think, in the past 30 years as close as losing that opportunity [of a trilateral agreement]."
• Kelly Ann Shaw: "President Trump was describing it as a zero-sum game. He wants the auto industry, I want the auto industry, only one of us is going to have it."
• Kirsten Hillman: "The agreement is the foundation of the integrated nature of our relationship. If it goes away, none of us are bound by those rules anymore."

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

The USMCA review is not merely a technical update but a high-stakes negotiation influenced by a desire to protect North American manufacturing from Chinese competition and to address trade deficits. While the Trump administration’s "zero-sum" approach creates uncertainty, the panelists agreed that the economic integration of the three nations is too deep to dismantle. The primary goal for all three countries is to leverage the 6-year review to provide long-term regulatory certainty, which is essential for continued cross-border investment and the global competitiveness of North American industries. The consensus is that while the agreement is not perfect, it remains the most effective framework for regional economic prosperity.