Can the US Afford an Energy Trade Fight?
By Bloomberg Television
Key Concepts
- USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement): The modern trade framework governing North American commerce, replacing NAFTA.
- Bilateralism: The tendency for North American energy trade to function as two separate relationships (US-Canada and US-Mexico) rather than a single multilateral bloc.
- Proportionality Clause: A defunct NAFTA provision that required Canada to maintain energy export levels to the US regardless of domestic shortages; absent in the USMCA.
- Energy Integration: The physical and economic interdependence of North American energy grids, specifically the reliance of US refineries on Canadian crude and Mexican reliance on US natural gas.
- State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs): Specifically Pemex (oil) and CFE (electricity) in Mexico, which have been prioritized by recent administrations over private/foreign investment.
1. The North American Energy Landscape
Energy trade in North America is characterized by deep physical integration but distinct bilateral dynamics. While the USMCA aims for a multilateral trade environment, energy trade operates primarily through two separate channels:
- US-Canada: A mature, highly integrated relationship where the US relies on Canada for 60% of its oil imports.
- US-Mexico: A relationship defined by Mexico’s heavy reliance on US natural gas, which accounts for 70% of Mexico’s annual imports and fuels 60% of its electricity generation.
2. Mexico: Policy Shifts and Market Friction
Mexico’s energy sector has undergone significant volatility, creating friction with US investors:
- Liberalization vs. Nationalization: The 2014 energy market liberalization under President Peña Nieto was reversed by the López Obrador administration (2018), which shifted Pemex and CFE from "productive entities" to "public entities."
- Investment Barriers: US firms face challenges due to constitutional amendments that grant preferential treatment to state-owned firms (Pemex/CFE) over private or foreign investors. This violates the USMCA principle of non-discriminatory treatment, creating a major hurdle for upcoming trade reviews.
- Real-World Application: Infrastructure projects, such as those by Howard Energy Partners, demonstrate the necessity of US energy for Mexican industrial growth (e.g., supplying natural gas to power the world’s largest brewery).
3. Canada: Infrastructure and Strategic Leverage
The US-Canada energy relationship is defined by long-standing infrastructure and historical policy:
- North-South Infrastructure: Due to the historical "proportionality clause" in NAFTA, Canadian energy infrastructure was built primarily on a north-south axis to serve the US market, rather than east-west.
- The Shale Revolution: The US transition to a major energy producer via the shale revolution rendered the old proportionality clause unnecessary, leading to its exclusion from the USMCA.
- Strategic Positioning: Canada is currently balancing its heavy reliance on the US market (90% of its energy exports) with a need for diversification. The current Canadian strategy focuses on demonstrating "mutually beneficial" value to the US rather than using energy as a retaliatory tool.
4. Key Arguments and Perspectives
- Mike Howard (CEO, Howard Energy Partners): Argues that energy is the foundational "business that powers every other business." He advocates for the continued free flow of energy, noting that US infrastructure is essential for Mexico’s economic stability.
- Diego Marroquin Bitar (CSIS): Highlights that the North American energy machine has been turning for over a century. He warns that increasing interdependence makes trade and investment obstacles—such as those in Mexico—highly disruptive to the broader economy.
- Chantal des Silva (Former CEO, Canada Energy Regulator): Notes that many Americans are unaware of Canada’s role as their largest energy supplier, often incorrectly assuming it is a Middle Eastern nation. She emphasizes that the relationship is "mutually beneficial" and that the status quo is the most desirable outcome for both nations.
5. Synthesis and Conclusion
The North American energy sector is a highly integrated, interdependent system that functions as the backbone of the continent's economy. While the US serves as a critical export market for Canadian oil and a vital supplier of natural gas to Mexico, political shifts in Mexico toward state-led energy models have created significant trade friction.
The consensus among industry experts is that the status quo—the free flow of energy—is the most beneficial outcome. As the USMCA undergoes review, the primary challenge will be managing the tension between Mexico’s desire for energy sovereignty and the reality of its deep reliance on US-produced energy, alongside Canada’s need to balance its singular dependence on the US market with long-term diversification goals.
Chat with this Video
AI-PoweredLoad the transcript when you're ready to chat so the initial page stays lighter.
Related Videos

The Close for Friday, June 26, 2026
BNN Bloomberg

'I will expect they will say on Wednesday they will continue to negotiate': Fagan on CUSMA
BNN Bloomberg

The Street for Monday, June 29, 2026
BNN Bloomberg

The Open for Monday, June 29, 2026
BNN Bloomberg

Morning Markets for Monday, June 29, 2026
BNN Bloomberg

Is there a Chinese cyber threat to EU solar energy? | DW News
DW News

South Korea bets big on AI with nearly a trillion dollars of investment • FRANCE 24 English
FRANCE 24 English