Can Taiwan still count on the US?

Key Concepts

• Strategic Ambiguity: A long-standing US policy of intentionally remaining vague regarding whether and how it would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese attack.
• Gray Zone Warfare: Non-kinetic, persistent pressure tactics used by China, including cyberattacks, economic coercion, misinformation, and military intimidation, falling short of open war.
• Semiconductor Supply Chain: Taiwan’s critical role in global technology, specifically as the primary manufacturer of advanced semiconductor chips.
• Arms Sales Backlog: The existing $30 billion delay in US weapons deliveries to Taiwan, which is now being exacerbated by a new $14 billion pause.

---

1. The US-Taiwan Arms Sale Pause

The US has placed a $14 billion arms sale to Taiwan on hold, a move widely interpreted as a diplomatic concession following Donald Trump’s recent summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

• The "Negotiating Chip" Narrative: Trump has publicly characterized arms sales to Taiwan as a bargaining tool, breaking with the decades-old US policy of keeping military support separate from broader diplomatic negotiations with Beijing.
• Official Justification: The US government claims the pause is necessary to prioritize munitions for the ongoing war in Iran. However, experts and Taiwanese officials remain skeptical, noting that these sales are long-term orders rather than immediate withdrawals from existing stockpiles.
• Timeline of Delay: The sale was approved by lawmakers in January, but the subsequent "Xi-Trump" summit created a political environment where the deal became a casualty of diplomatic maneuvering.

2. Shifting Geopolitical Dynamics

The relationship between the US and Taiwan is undergoing a period of significant strain, leading to a decline in trust.

• Erosion of Reliability: Polling data from April shows that 40% of Taiwanese hold a negative view of the US, up from 24% two years prior.
• Regional Hedging: Countries like Japan, South Korea, and the Philippines are increasingly "hedging"—bolstering their own defense industries and forming regional alliances—due to the perception that the US is no longer a reliable security guarantor.
• Adoption of Beijing’s Rhetoric: Observers note that Trump has begun using terminology favored by Beijing, such as referring to the "Taiwan problem" and framing Taiwan as a "troublemaker," which has caused deep alarm in Taipei.

3. Gray Zone Warfare and Taiwan’s Defense

Taiwan is currently facing a daily, multi-front campaign of pressure from China that does not involve a full-scale invasion (D-Day) but rather constant attrition (the "everyday").

• Tactics: Millions of daily cyberattacks on government infrastructure, diplomatic isolation, and the constant presence of Chinese military vessels (sometimes within 24 nautical miles of the coast).
• Civilian Mobilization: Despite political gridlock—where opposition parties blocked a portion of a $40 billion defense budget—the Taiwanese public is increasingly proactive. Citizens are organizing for first-aid training and civil defense, signaling to China that the island is prepared for a "long and hard battle."
• Public Resolve: Recent polls indicate that 60% of Taiwanese are willing to defend their country even without direct US intervention.

4. Global Economic Stakes

The video highlights that a conflict in the Taiwan Strait would have catastrophic global consequences, far exceeding the economic impact of the war in Ukraine or the disruption of the Strait of Hormuz.

• Tech Dependency: Because Taiwan produces the majority of the world’s most sophisticated semiconductor chips, any unilateral move by China would paralyze the global tech supply chain, affecting everything from smartphones and robotics to advanced weaponry.

5. Conclusion and Outlook

The pause in arms sales is likely to persist through the end of the year, as multiple high-level summits (APEC, G20, and a potential Washington visit by Xi) remain on the calendar. While the pause may be temporary, the strategic signal is permanent: Taiwan is being forced to confront a reality where it must rely more on its own defensive capabilities and less on the traditional US security umbrella. This shift in the balance of power is likely to reshape regional security for years to come.