Author Sally Rooney says she will continue to support Palestine Action despite ban. #BBCNews

BBC NewsAbout 2 min readAug 19, 2025Watch original
THE SUMMARYAI-generated

Key Concepts:

  • Palestine Action: A pro-Palestinian direct action group.
  • Prescribed Terrorist Organization: Designation by the UK government leading to legal repercussions for membership and support.
  • Sally Rooney: Author of "Normal People" and "Conversations with Friends," vocal supporter of Palestine Action.
  • UK Law: Legislation criminalizing support for prescribed terrorist organizations.
  • Home Secretary: Government official defending the ban on Palestine Action.

Sally Rooney's Support for Palestine Action

The core issue revolves around author Sally Rooney's continued and public support for Palestine Action, despite the group being officially banned as a terrorist organization in the UK. Rooney stated her intention to remain a vocal supporter in an article published in the Irish Times.

Legality and Consequences

Rooney acknowledges the legal ramifications of her support. The UK government banned Palestine Action on July 5th, making membership and any form of support, including financial contributions, punishable by imprisonment of up to 14 years. Rooney explicitly stated that she uses proceeds from her work, including payments from BBC adaptations of her novels, to support Palestine Action. She is aware that this could legally classify her as a supporter of terrorism under UK law, and accepts this potential consequence. "If this makes her a supporter of terror under UK law, so be it."

Palestine Action's Activities and Government Response

Since the ban, over 700 people have been arrested in connection with Palestine Action, including over 500 at a single demonstration in central London a week prior to the report. The Home Secretary defended the government's decision to proscribe the group, arguing that Palestine Action is "more than just a regular protest group known for occasional stunts." This suggests the government views the group's activities as posing a significant threat, justifying the stringent legal measures.

Conclusion

The situation highlights the conflict between freedom of expression and national security concerns. Sally Rooney is willing to risk legal repercussions to support a cause she believes in, while the UK government is determined to suppress what it considers a terrorist organization. The case raises questions about the definition of terrorism, the limits of free speech, and the responsibilities of public figures.

AI summaries can miss context or contain errors. Check important details against the original video.

MAKE IT YOURS

Read. Remember. Reuse.

Free tools

Go a little deeper.

Have a question about this video? Load its transcript to open the video chat.