Anthony Albanese announces a royal commission into Bondi attacks | 7.30

Key Concepts

• Royal Commission: A high-level public inquiry with broad powers, including the ability to compel evidence.
• Anti-Semitism: Hostility to, prejudice, or discrimination against Jews.
• Social Cohesion: The willingness of members of a society to cooperate for social benefit.
• Terms of Reference: The specific scope and guidelines for a Royal Commission’s investigation.
• Richardson Review: A national security review established in response to the Bondi attack.
• Hate Laws: Legislation aimed at criminalizing incitement to violence or hatred.
• Coronial Inquiry: An investigation into the circumstances of a death or other serious incident.

Federal Royal Commission into Anti-Semitism and Social Cohesion: A Detailed Summary

Introduction

Following sustained public and political pressure in the wake of the Bondi terror attack, the Prime Minister has announced a Federal Royal Commission into anti-Semitism and social cohesion. The commission will be led by former High Court Judge Virginia Bell and is expected to deliver its report by December of this year. This decision represents a reversal of the government’s initial stance, which favored cooperation with a New South Wales state inquiry. The New South Wales inquiry will now not proceed, given the establishment of the Federal Commission.

Background and Initial Government Response

The Bondi attack triggered immediate criticism of the government’s handling of anti-Semitism. While the government initially resisted calls for a Royal Commission, citing the time required for such an inquiry – referencing the lack of commissions after the Port Arthur massacre (Howard government) and the Lindt siege (Abbott government) – it faced increasing pressure from diverse groups including victims’ families, business leaders, sporting figures, and members of the Labour Party. The Prime Minister emphasized that the initial focus was on national security, leading to the establishment of the Richardson Review (a national security review), increased funding for security agencies, and strengthening recommendations from a special envoy’s report on combating anti-Semitism. Legislation on hate laws was also being drafted. Initial government strategy involved full cooperation with a proposed New South Wales Royal Commission, effectively aiming for a joint Commonwealth-State inquiry.

The Shift in Position & Rationale

The Prime Minister explained the change in position as a strategic decision to address the escalating public concern. He stated that reversing course during the summer break was preferable to allowing the issue to “fester.” He framed the decision as a move towards “national unity” and emphasized the importance of a considered, orderly approach to government. He highlighted the extensive consultations undertaken to develop the “terms of reference” for the commission, stating that these were not hastily assembled but carefully crafted over time with community input.

Terms of Reference and Consultation Process

The Prime Minister stressed the importance of getting the terms of reference “right” through proper consultation with the Jewish community. He detailed personal meetings with families of victims, including Rabbi Ulman in New York and families in Australia, as well as leaders of Jewish community organizations. He noted that the finalized terms of reference have been welcomed by a range of organizations, indicating a degree of consensus. The Prime Minister contrasted this approach with what he characterized as attempts by others to create “division.”

Addressing Concerns Regarding Timing and Leadership

Responding to questions about the delay in announcing the Federal Royal Commission, the Prime Minister defended the government’s process, stating that in a “24-hour media cycle,” it’s crucial to be an “orderly, considered government.” He also addressed concerns about his leadership, acknowledging the “backflip” but arguing that he had listened to the community and adjusted his position accordingly. He emphasized that a leader should be willing to listen and adapt in a democracy. He refuted the suggestion that the decision indicated weakness, stating that he had engaged constructively with families and community leaders.

Virginia Bell’s Appointment and Potential Challenges

The appointment of former High Court Judge Virginia Bell as Royal Commissioner has drawn some criticism from within the Jewish community, with concerns raised about her perceived left-leaning views. The Prime Minister defended the appointment, highlighting Bell’s distinguished career and the high regard in which she is held, noting her receipt of the Companion of the Order of Australia. He stated he had seen no legitimate criticism of her views.

He also addressed the challenge of conducting the Royal Commission alongside ongoing criminal proceedings against the alleged perpetrator of the Bondi attack. The terms of reference explicitly state the need to conduct the inquiry in a manner that does not prejudice criminal proceedings or undermine national security or social cohesion. Bell’s experience was cited as crucial to achieving this balance.

Addressing Concerns about Platforming Extremism & Promoting Social Cohesion

The Prime Minister acknowledged earlier concerns about a Royal Commission potentially providing a platform for individuals with violent anti-Semitic views. He explained that the terms of reference include provisions to prevent the commission from undermining social cohesion. He emphasized the importance of reinforcing national unity and respecting diversity, highlighting that the Bondi attack was not only a targeting of Jewish Australians but also an attack on the Australian way of life. He noted that Australians overwhelmingly desire peace and security for both Israelis and Palestinians and do not want conflict imported into Australia.

Prime Minister’s Willingness to Testify

When asked if he would be prepared to give evidence to the Royal Commission, the Prime Minister stated that this would be a decision for the commission to make independently. He reiterated that the government had established the terms of reference and would allow the commissioner to conduct her work without government interference. He confirmed that the terms of reference would be submitted to the Governor-General for approval and that the Attorney-General’s Department was already working to establish the necessary infrastructure for the commission.

Conclusion

The establishment of the Federal Royal Commission represents a significant response to the Bondi terror attack and the subsequent outcry over anti-Semitism in Australia. The government’s initial resistance, followed by a reversal, underscores the power of public pressure and the importance of community consultation. The success of the commission will depend on its ability to navigate the complex challenges of balancing the need for a thorough investigation with the requirements of ongoing criminal proceedings and the imperative of promoting social cohesion. The appointment of Virginia Bell, despite some initial reservations, signals a commitment to a high-level inquiry, and the carefully crafted terms of reference aim to ensure a focused and productive investigation.