All countries must increase defence spending; no one is exempt: Philippine defence chief

Key Concepts

• National Defense Imperative: The necessity for all nations, regardless of size, to invest in and build independent defense capabilities.
• Defense Spending Benchmarks: The discussion surrounding the 3.5% GDP defense spending target advocated by US officials.
• Deterrence: The strategic goal of building military capabilities to discourage aggression rather than just accumulating hardware.
• Balikatan Exercise: The largest-ever joint military exercise between the Philippines and its partners, aimed at enhancing regional resilience.
• Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ): The maritime area over which the Philippines claims sovereign rights, currently contested by China.
• Nine-Dash Line: The expansive, controversial maritime claim by China in the South China Sea, which the Philippines rejects as a violation of its sovereignty.

---

1. Defense Spending and Economic Realities

Secretary Gilberto Teodoro emphasizes that no country is exempt from the responsibility of building a national defense. He argues that for regional blocs like ASEAN to be effective, individual member states must mature their defense capabilities.

• Economic Challenges: Teodoro acknowledges that a 3.5% GDP defense spending target is difficult for agricultural economies compared to industrial ones, which possess larger revenue flows and more mature defense systems.
• The "Time Window" Problem: A critical concern is the speed of the "industrial cycle" and "political systems" in approving budgets. Teodoro warns that if these processes are not accelerated, nations will be outpaced by rapidly evolving military technology, making it increasingly difficult to catch up.
• Focus on Deterrence: The objective is not merely the quantity of military assets, but the quality of the "deterrent force" shaped by those capabilities.

2. The Balikatan Exercise and Regional Security

The Balikatan exercise is framed as a vital initiative for the Philippines to increase its resilience against daily territorial incursions in the West Philippine Sea and the South China Sea.

• Strategic Intent: The exercises are public and intended for the mutual defense of the Philippines and its treaty partners. Teodoro asserts that these exercises should only concern those who have "designs" against the Philippines.
• Indo-Pacific Positioning: Teodoro highlights that the Philippines is not only an ASEAN nation but also an "Indo-Polynesian" and "Pacific Islander" nation, justifying closer security ties with Pacific neighbors.

3. Stance on China and Territorial Disputes

Teodoro maintains a firm position regarding China’s objections to Philippine military activities.

• Rejection of Chinese Concerns: Teodoro explicitly states, "It is not our obligation to help China understand," arguing that the Philippines' primary duty is to its own citizens. He dismisses Chinese concerns as being rooted in "preconceived designs" rather than legitimate security fears.
• Defining "Designs": When asked to define these designs, Teodoro points to:
  • The Nine-Dash Line: A claim he describes as an attempt to occupy the majority of the West Philippine Sea.
  • Physical Occupation: He cites the occupation of Mischief Reef and the exclusion of Filipino fishermen from Scarborough Shoal as evidence of aggressive intent.
  • Geographic Discrepancy: He questions the legitimacy of Chinese presence 800 km away from their own coastline.

4. Notable Quotes

• "There is no one country that is exempt from building your own national defense."
• "If our own individual capabilities are not matured... how can we, as a block, protect ourselves?"
• "It is not our obligation to help China understand. Our obligation, first and foremost, are to the Filipino people we are sworn to defend."

---

Synthesis and Conclusion

The interview underscores a shift in Philippine defense policy toward greater self-reliance and strengthened international partnerships. Secretary Teodoro argues that the economic burden of defense spending is a necessary trade-off to avoid being technologically and strategically outpaced. By framing the Balikatan exercises as a defensive necessity against specific, documented territorial incursions (such as the occupation of Mischief Reef), the Philippines is signaling a move away from diplomatic appeasement toward a posture of active deterrence and regional integration with Pacific partners. The core takeaway is that the Philippines views its defense strategy as an existential requirement to protect its EEZ and sovereign rights against external expansionism.