A-bomb survivor keeps eye on NPT meetingーNHK WORLD-JAPAN NEWS

Key Concepts

• NPT (Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons): A landmark international treaty aimed at preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, promoting peaceful nuclear energy use, and furthering the goal of disarmament.
• Nuclear Deterrence: The theory that the possession of nuclear weapons prevents an adversary from attacking due to the threat of retaliation; survivors and activists argue this is a dangerous fallacy.
• Nuclear Abolition: The movement and goal to completely eliminate nuclear weapons from the global arsenal.
• Hibakusha: A term for survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, who play a central role in global advocacy against nuclear proliferation.
• Geopolitical Uncertainty: The current state of global instability, specifically citing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, which complicates diplomatic consensus.

---

1. The NPT Review Conference Overview

The United Nations is hosting a month-long international conference in New York to review the NPT, a pact joined by 191 states. Held every five years, the conference focuses on three pillars:

• Disarmament: Reducing and eventually eliminating nuclear stockpiles.
• Non-proliferation: Preventing the spread of nuclear weapons technology.
• Peaceful use of nuclear energy: Ensuring access to nuclear technology for civilian purposes under strict oversight.

Current Status: UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has issued a stark warning that, for the first time in decades, the global count of nuclear warheads is increasing, and nuclear testing is once again being considered by some nations.

2. Challenges to Consensus

The conference faces significant hurdles in adopting a final document, a feat not achieved since 2010.

• Geopolitical Friction: Tensions are high, with the US and Iran openly sparring during the opening sessions.
• Escalating Threats: Russia’s repeated threats to deploy nuclear weapons in the context of the Ukraine conflict and France’s stated plans to increase its nuclear arsenal have created an atmosphere of anxiety.
• Structural Weakness: There is concern that the post-war global order is "unraveling," making it difficult for member states to find common ground on arms reduction.

3. The Role of Atomic Bomb Survivors (Hibakusha)

The conference features the active participation of survivors like 82-year-old Kawazoe Tadako, who traveled from Nagasaki to advocate for abolition.

• Advocacy Methodology: Survivors utilize "peace education," which involves sharing first-hand accounts of nuclear destruction to influence younger generations.
• Key Argument: Survivors argue that nuclear deterrence is a dangerous illusion that risks "unexpected incidents." They emphasize that peace must be achieved through dialogue and diplomacy rather than the threat of force.
• Personal Testimony: Kawazoe Tadako noted, "I feel very passionately about a world where there are no atomic weapons, and a world where nuclear deterrence or nuclear threats are not a part of war negotiations."

4. The "Hollowing Out" of the NPT

A major concern among activists is that the NPT could become "hollowed out"—meaning it remains a treaty in name but loses its binding force or practical impact.

• The Gap: Many nations are not part of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, and nuclear-armed states remain outside of it, leaving the NPT as the primary, albeit struggling, framework for global nuclear governance.
• Generational Urgency: As the number of survivors diminishes due to age, there is a heightened sense of urgency to influence public opinion and policy before the direct memory of nuclear horror fades.

5. Synthesis and Conclusion

The NPT review conference serves as a critical, albeit fragile, forum for global nuclear policy. While the treaty remains the "cornerstone" of the non-proliferation regime, the current geopolitical climate—marked by regional conflicts and a resurgence in nuclear rhetoric—threatens to prevent a unified agreement. The persistent advocacy of survivors provides a moral imperative for the conference, highlighting that the alternative to disarmament is not stability, but an increased risk of catastrophic, accidental, or intentional nuclear use. The success of the conference will be measured by whether member states can overcome their current divisions to produce a substantive final document.