3 Winners from Our Fund Rating Methodology Changes

Key Concepts

• Morningstar Medalist Ratings: A qualitative assessment system used to evaluate investment funds.
• Alpha Potential: The ability of an investment strategy to outperform a market benchmark.
• Glide Path: The strategic adjustment of an asset allocation mix over time, typically becoming more conservative as a target date (e.g., retirement) approaches.
• Basis Points (bps): A unit of measure for interest rates and other percentages in finance; one basis point is equal to 1/100th of 1% (0.01%).
• Pillar Ratings: The specific criteria (People, Process, Parent) used by Morningstar to evaluate funds.

---

Overview of Methodology Changes

Morningstar has transitioned to a simplified structure for its Medalist Ratings. The previous methodology relied heavily on analyzing past returns and their variance to infer "alpha potential," which was then used to adjust ratings. This approach penalized funds in categories with lower alpha potential, even if the funds were fundamentally strong or operated in markets where indexing was not a viable strategy. The new methodology removes these complex "moving parts," focusing more directly on fundamental strengths, which has resulted in upgrades for several high-quality funds.

Target-Date Funds and the "Glide Path"

Target-date funds are highlighted as a major industry success, providing investors with low-cost exposure and a structured "glide path" for retirement planning. Previously, these funds struggled to achieve "Gold" ratings because their returns often clustered in a tight band, making it difficult for any single fund to statistically outperform its peers.

• Case Study: T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030:
  • Upgrade: Elevated from Bronze to Gold.
  • Rationale: The fund demonstrated high "Pillar" ratings across the board, specifically regarding its underlying fund quality and the expertise of the team managing the glide path.
  • Cost: The retail share class charges 55 basis points, which is noted as being slightly cheaper than the industry average.

Active Management in Inefficient Markets

The new methodology acknowledges that in certain asset classes, indexing is not a practical solution, necessitating active management and rigorous credit research.

• Bank Loan Funds: These require active liquidity management and credit analysis.
  • Case Study: Fidelity Floating Rate High Income: Upgraded from Bronze to Gold. The fund is recognized for its strong "People" and "Process" ratings, alongside an "Above-Average" parent company rating.
• Municipal Bond Funds:
  • Case Study: Fidelity Intermediate Municipal Income: Upgraded from Bronze to Gold. This decision was driven by a low fee structure (37 basis points) combined with high process and people ratings.

Synthesis and Conclusion

The shift in Morningstar’s rating methodology represents a move away from rigid, return-variance-based metrics toward a more holistic evaluation of a fund's fundamental pillars. By reducing the reliance on past return variance, Morningstar is now better able to reward funds that demonstrate strong management, sound processes, and reasonable fee structures—even in categories where outsized alpha is difficult to generate. The primary takeaway is that high-quality funds in specialized or less efficient markets are now receiving the recognition they deserve, moving away from a system that previously penalized them for the inherent limitations of their specific asset classes.