'100s of attacks on churches': Jim Jordan SLAMS Biden-era DOJ, SPLC after shocking indictment

Key Concepts

• FACE Act (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act): A federal law that prohibits the use of force, threat of force, or physical obstruction to injure, intimidate, or interfere with persons seeking or providing reproductive health services.
• SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center): A non-profit legal advocacy organization that tracks extremist groups; the speakers in the transcript allege it holds a biased, left-leaning agenda.
• Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs): Organizations that provide support and counseling to pregnant women, often from a pro-life perspective.
• "Double Dipping": The hypothesis that individuals might be receiving payments simultaneously from both private organizations (like the SPLC) and the federal government for acting as informants or instigators.
• Federalism: The constitutional principle regarding the division of power between the federal government and the states; speakers argue the FACE Act improperly grants federal police power over state-level issues.

1. Allegations of Collusion and "Scam" Operations

The transcript centers on a congressional hearing where participants allege a deep, unethical connection between the Biden Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

• The SPLC "Scam": Speakers claim the SPLC recently paid $3 million to "informants" to incite the very hate they publicly claim to oppose.
• DOJ-SPLC Relationship: It is argued that the DOJ utilized the SPLC to train prosecutors on enforcing the FACE Act. Critics contend this creates "branch offices" of left-wing activist groups within the federal government, allowing these groups to influence federal policy and enforcement priorities.
• Ethical Breaches: The discussion highlights a DOJ report suggesting that a department official endorsed a grant application for an abortion-activist group, which is cited as a clear ethical violation and potential subject of an investigation.

2. Attacks on Pro-Life Entities

A significant portion of the testimony focuses on the wave of violence against religious and pro-life institutions following the leak and subsequent ruling of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision.

• Scope of Violence: Witnesses claim there were "hundreds" of attacks on churches and crisis pregnancy centers.
• Specific Examples:
  • Amherst, New York: A pro-life pregnancy center was firebombed, resulting in $500,000 in damages and injuries to two firefighters.
  • Madison, Wisconsin: A pregnancy center was firebombed.
  • Texas: Three Catholic churches were attacked on May 9, 2022.
  • Michigan: The Family Life Services Pregnancy Center was vandalized.
• Perpetrator Groups: Groups such as "Jane’s Revenge" and "Ruth Sent Us" were identified as being responsible for these acts. The speakers noted that these groups do not appear on the SPLC’s "hate list," which they argue proves the SPLC is not a credible or objective organization.

3. The "Informant vs. Instigator" Argument

A central argument presented is that the federal government’s use of confidential human sources (CHS) may be linked to the SPLC’s own informant network.

• The Hypothesis: Speakers suggest that individuals paid by the SPLC to act as informants may also be on the federal payroll.
• Instigation: There is a concern that these individuals are not merely reporting on activities but are actively "instigating" the violence against churches and pregnancy centers. The speakers argue that the government should investigate whether taxpayer money is inadvertently funding the very groups committing these attacks.

4. Constitutional and Legal Perspectives

• Federalism Concerns: One witness argued that the FACE Act is fundamentally flawed because it exercises federal police power in a way that infringes upon state sovereignty. They contend that there is no constitutional basis for federal intervention in these local public safety matters.
• Selective Enforcement: The speakers argue that the DOJ uses the FACE Act as a tool to target pro-life activists while ignoring or downplaying violence committed by left-wing groups against religious institutions.

5. Notable Quotes

• On the SPLC’s credibility: "If as a conservative activist you are condemned by the Southern Poverty Law Center, consider that a resume builder." — Witness Mr. Farah
• On the DOJ-Activist relationship: "They pretty much create their own little branch offices within the DOJ whenever you have liberals in power." — Speaker (unidentified)
• On the potential for government-funded instigation: "I think maybe what the SPLC calls informants we might call instigators." — Speaker (unidentified)

Synthesis and Conclusion

The hearing transcript reflects a highly critical view of the current administration's relationship with advocacy groups like the SPLC. The primary takeaway is a call for oversight into the DOJ’s enforcement of the FACE Act, specifically regarding the potential for "collusion" with outside groups and the possibility that government-funded informants may be involved in inciting violence against pro-life organizations. The speakers emphasize that the lack of accountability for attacks on churches and pregnancy centers, contrasted with the aggressive prosecution of pro-life activists, represents a significant failure in the impartial administration of justice.